Skip to main content
Now in beta, Request early access →

Voltra for Controllers and Office Managers

GL reconciliation, F&I remittance, and cash-in-transit shouldn't live in three spreadsheets you rebuild every close. Voltra gives you a live workspace for each one, and it never writes to your books. Your GL stays the system of record.

Get a Demo See How It Works

Free · 15 minutes · Works with the tools you already run

Short answer

Voltra gives a controller or office manager live workspaces for GL reconciliation, F&I product remittance matching, and cash-in-transit monitoring, the jobs that usually run on spreadsheets rebuilt every close. You build reconciliation rules, match remittance line items against back-office cost, and track every CIT deal through its funding lifecycle, with daily visibility instead of waiting for month-end to find the gaps. Voltra reads from your GL and never writes to it. Your DMS and GL stay the system of record for the books.

The back office runs on spreadsheets that only tell the truth once a month

Reconciliation is supposed to be a control, not a scavenger hunt. But at most stores it's a spreadsheet rebuilt from a GL export, matched by hand against whatever the schedule was last time, and it only really gets attention when the close is due. Remittance is worse: a provider workbook lands, and someone matches every contract against back-office cost line by line, hoping the totals tie out before the deadline.

Cash-in-transit is its own headache. A deal funds, or it doesn't, or it's stuck on a title issue nobody flagged, and the only record of any of it is whoever remembered to update the tracking sheet. None of this is a discipline problem, it's that the tools that should show daily financial visibility, the GL, the DMS, the F&I provider portal, don't talk to each other, so the controller's office becomes the place where all of it gets reconciled by hand, once a month, under deadline.

What Voltra does for controllers and office managers

The honest fit

Built for you if

  • You rebuild a reconciliation or remittance spreadsheet by hand every close
  • CIT status lives in a tracking sheet that's only as current as the last person who updated it
  • You find a mismatch during the close instead of the week it actually happened
  • You're the one holding title, CIT, and remittance status together across multiple systems

Not for you if

  • Your GL and DMS already give you daily reconciliation visibility without manual matching
  • You're shopping for a new GL or accounting system, Voltra doesn't replace either
  • You need Voltra to post or edit ledger entries, it reads your GL and never writes to it

That's the same bar we hold to on a demo call. If your close process already gives you daily reconciliation and remittance visibility, we'll say so. For a broader look at what back offices run at different store sizes, see the best used car dealer software, by store size.

Common questions from controllers and office managers

Most of a close is spent reconciling, matching a GL export against schedules by hand, chasing open items that should have been resolved weeks earlier, and re-verifying remittance totals that were never checked between statements. The close gets shorter when that work happens continuously instead of all at once: attach a note to an open item the day it appears, run your reconciliation rules weekly instead of at deadline, and keep remittance matched as statements arrive instead of batching a month of them. A spreadsheet can do this if someone owns it every week without fail. Voltra's GL reconciliation runs rules against your GL data continuously and lets you work open items as they surface, so close week is verification, not first-time discovery.

Track four things for every open deal: current funding status, days since the deal closed, the assigned biller, and a funding-delay reason the moment one comes up. Review the list daily and escalate anything sitting past your normal funding window. A spreadsheet handles this if one person updates it every day without exception, which is exactly where it tends to fail, multiple billers, multiple rooftops, or a volume where a stuck deal can go unnoticed for a week. Voltra's cash-in-transit module tracks every deal through its funding lifecycle with status changes timestamped automatically, so aging calculates itself instead of being someone's daily update.

The manual version: a provider workbook lands, someone matches every line against your back-office cost by hand, flags disagreements, and argues them over email until the totals tie out or somebody eats the difference. It works at low contract volume with one provider. It breaks once you're running multiple providers or enough contracts that a line-by-line manual match becomes a multi-day job every statement cycle. In Voltra, you upload the provider's workbook, map its columns, and it matches each line against your back-office cost automatically; you mark each contract include or exclude with a note, finalize the batch to lock it, and export a CSV, one workflow instead of a spreadsheet passed back and forth.

No. Voltra reads your GL transactions and displays them, but the GL entries themselves are imported and read-only inside Voltra. What you can do is attach notes to open schedule items, configure which accounts show up in a schedule, build and run reconciliation rules against that data, and override account classification for reporting. Your DMS and GL stay the system of record for the books; nothing you do in Voltra changes an actual ledger entry.

No. Voltra is not an accounting system and doesn't replace your GL, DMS, or close process. It reads from what you already run and never writes back, so your existing system stays the system of record for the books. What changes is visibility between closes, you catch a reconciliation gap or a remittance mismatch the week it happens instead of during the close itself.